Just had this thought, and I wondered if anyone else had an opinion.

I'm not sure it made much difference.  Lame + lame = still lame

You know, a REAL TF fanatic can write a dissertation on this topic. If you reduce each character into a mathematical model and plot out the lameness using a scale, you will find that Daniel is actually a lot less lame than Arcee. Daniel actually got lamer after he was binary bonded to Arcee, and Arcee, well, she's just lame.

About as lame

Was Arcee less lame or more lame

 

This is like asking if there is water in the ocean?  The answer to both questions is yes. :thumb

You know, a REAL TF fanatic can write a dissertation on this topic. If you reduce each character into a mathematical model and plot out the lameness using a scale, you will find that Daniel is actually a lot less lame than Arcee. Daniel actually got lamer after he was binary bonded to Arcee, and Arcee, well, she's just lame.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

Actually, Daniel got physically "Lame"r just prior to the bonding by getting himself chewed up by Snapdragon....  And then Arcee got physically "Lame"r when she had her head removed.  So both became physically lamer.  And as far as the overall lameness....  pre-pubescent boy love with a pedophilic robot definitely equates to lame.

Another reason why that season was the worst.

I like how everytime Zarak spoke, his voice was run through a stack of Marshall amps with the reverb set to 10.

i think making her a headmaster was a neat move.. but since we didn't get a toy either way, meh.

i think making her a headmaster was a neat move.. but since we didn't get a toy either way, meh.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

OMG U R WRONG!!!!!