QUOTE (trench @ Aug 19 2008, 06:55 PM)

QUOTE (Agent Zero @ Aug 19 2008, 11:21 AM)

It's bashing two figures when you love a third figure with the same problems as the other two that I don't get.
It's because it's not as subjective as just evaluating the merits of the individual toys themselves- and of the three, one represents a popular new character, while two are half-hearted attempts to revive 20-year old characters about whom most people never really cared. Guess who gets cut the slack?
Megatron's a popular
new character? So I guess the lead antagonist in BW really was Barney on steroids....
Anyway, while I see where you're coming from (kinda), I really don't see the logic behind it. At the end of the day the character represented is second to the actual toy. I don't know about you, but I would buy a kickass toy that represents an obscure character then a so-so toy that represents a primary character (Energon Sharkticon > Energon Optimus Prime).
At the end of the day we have Leader Megatron, Ultra Silverbolt, and Ultra Powerglide. All three have very simple transformation schemes that could probably work on a Deluxe sized figure. All three also happen to have good alt modes and really good robot modes. Megatron gets praised despite the simple transformation and the two Ultras get slammed because of it, when in actuality all three toys have pretty much the same things going for them and against them.
Try to rationalize it if you want, to me it just seems like a knee-jerk reaction on the part of the fandom.
QUOTE (Cadogen @ Aug 19 2008, 07:44 PM)

Keep in mind, the reviews are based on MY opinions. They're not meant to tell anyone what they should think, but only offer another viewpoint. I try to be as subjective as possible in the body of the review, leaving my final personal view until the end.
No worries. I wasn't even trying to single you out. I was commenting more on the fandom's reaction to those three figures in general, rather then on one individual's opinion.