QUOTE (Lord Madhammer @ Aug 1 2008, 02:34 PM)

QUOTE (( . Y . ) @ Aug 1 2008, 04:32 PM)

I understand the line of thought (I took Civics, lol) but I would believe the majority of people aren't as interested in their state governments. To many degrees, of course, but people as a whole are more interested in national politics.
I'm also guessing the Federalists' case would have been much stronger today, as we have a pretty strong nationwide communications system.
Exactly! We're not living on farms and sh*t with the pony express anymore!
and that is relevant how? we still should be involved in our local govts. removing the electorate would further damage the govt that the constitution sets up.
QUOTE (Lord Madhammer @ Aug 1 2008, 02:38 PM)

QUOTE (Nomolos @ Aug 1 2008, 04:36 PM)

wow, I don't know what to say to that. you really don't care about your state govt? they have so much more to do with your life than apparently you realize. but anyway. its not indirect if you vote on your reps, that's a direct vote. its not any more direct if you vote for a president. he's still got to live up to what he says. and since the reps are the lawmakers that's where our voice needs to be heard.
I just know the relative place of state government. Of course I care about the roads and schools and stuff. But the national issues are the ones that are really important to me. It doesn't do me any good to have a voice in my state government if my president is acting like a fargwit in front of the entire world.
it could matter a great deal. in your state you could directly affect the things that are close to you about in a much more real way than bashing the pres. online.
*edit- btw you just proved my point. by taking your voice in the stae govt you affect who votes for the president.