Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Electing a US President
TFormers Community > General News & Discussions > Politics
Pages: 1, 2
Lord Madhammer
QUOTE (Nomolos @ Aug 1 2008, 03:57 PM) *
QUOTE (Lord Madhammer @ Aug 1 2008, 01:51 PM) *
I think you guys are talking about the difference between what is and what should be.

depending on who you ask what should be. I think more power should be given back to the states. seems like maybe you guys think the states should go away and we just have the one govt. I could be wrong. I'm just guessing. but I like the way it is, in that the population doesn't decide, being that most people really wouldn't understand what we've been discussing. I tend to think the electors have a slightly better focused interest in our country and are probably more educated on the workings than the avg person.

That shouldn't be *my* problem, though. I would like to have a direct voice in my government. I don't get the angst about states' rights, personally, but Shrug.gif to each his own.
Nomolos
QUOTE (Smooth Jazz @ Aug 1 2008, 01:59 PM) *
QUOTE (Nomolos @ Aug 1 2008, 04:50 PM) *
I go back to the same thing. the electoral college is set up to allow the States to elect the president. not the people. it was never intended that the people vote directly on the president. we live in a republic where the local govt decides along with the 49 other local govts who will lead the big govt. we vote on representatives and senators, that's our branch to make a difference. they already took the senate away from the states so where would their voice be in the natl govt without the electors?


Fair enough. I get what you're saying. The one question I still have though is, what do you define as a "state" in this context? It can't just be a demarcated chunk of land, it has to be defined as some person or group of people that can make a decision. In this case, is the "state" defined as the governor, the legislature, the state courts? Who is the "state" that needs a voice in national government, if not the people within?

State Government (however your state is set up. GA has a house and senate). that's who used to appoint the senators and it is who appoints the electorates.
and LMH your direct voice in government is the house and senate. we have 2X the voice our forefathers intended as of the senate amendment. how direct a voice do you want? and do you want it at the expense of your sovereign states ability to have a voice?
Lord Madhammer
QUOTE (Nomolos @ Aug 1 2008, 04:24 PM) *
QUOTE (Smooth Jazz @ Aug 1 2008, 01:59 PM) *
QUOTE (Nomolos @ Aug 1 2008, 04:50 PM) *
I go back to the same thing. the electoral college is set up to allow the States to elect the president. not the people. it was never intended that the people vote directly on the president. we live in a republic where the local govt decides along with the 49 other local govts who will lead the big govt. we vote on representatives and senators, that's our branch to make a difference. they already took the senate away from the states so where would their voice be in the natl govt without the electors?


Fair enough. I get what you're saying. The one question I still have though is, what do you define as a "state" in this context? It can't just be a demarcated chunk of land, it has to be defined as some person or group of people that can make a decision. In this case, is the "state" defined as the governor, the legislature, the state courts? Who is the "state" that needs a voice in national government, if not the people within?

State Government (however your state is set up. GA has a house and senate). that's who used to appoint the senators and it is who appoints the electorates.
and LMH your direct voice in government is the house and senate. we have 2X the voice our forefathers intended as of the senate amendment. how direct a voice do you want? and do you want it at the expense of your sovereign states ability to have a voice?

Who the fuck cares about my state?

BTW that would be "indirect" if it goes through somebody else.
DarkNarcoleptic
I understand the line of thought (I took Civics, lol) but I would believe the majority of people aren't as interested in their state governments. To many degrees, of course, but people as a whole are more interested in national politics.

I'm also guessing the Federalists' case would have been much stronger today, as we have a pretty strong nationwide communications system.
Lord Madhammer
QUOTE (( . Y . ) @ Aug 1 2008, 04:32 PM) *
I understand the line of thought (I took Civics, lol) but I would believe the majority of people aren't as interested in their state governments. To many degrees, of course, but people as a whole are more interested in national politics.

I'm also guessing the Federalists' case would have been much stronger today, as we have a pretty strong nationwide communications system.

Exactly! We're not living on farms and sh*t with the pony express anymore!
Nomolos
wow, I don't know what to say to that. you really don't care about your state govt? they have so much more to do with your life than apparently you realize. but anyway. its not indirect if you vote on your reps, that's a direct vote. its not any more direct if you vote for a president. he's still got to live up to what he says. and since the reps are the lawmakers that's where our voice needs to be heard.
Lord Madhammer
QUOTE (Nomolos @ Aug 1 2008, 04:36 PM) *
wow, I don't know what to say to that. you really don't care about your state govt? they have so much more to do with your life than apparently you realize. but anyway. its not indirect if you vote on your reps, that's a direct vote. its not any more direct if you vote for a president. he's still got to live up to what he says. and since the reps are the lawmakers that's where our voice needs to be heard.

I just know the relative place of state government. Of course I care about the roads and schools and stuff. But the national issues are the ones that are really important to me. It doesn't do me any good to have a voice in my state government if my president is acting like a fuckwit in front of the entire world.
Nomolos
QUOTE (Lord Madhammer @ Aug 1 2008, 02:34 PM) *
QUOTE (( . Y . ) @ Aug 1 2008, 04:32 PM) *
I understand the line of thought (I took Civics, lol) but I would believe the majority of people aren't as interested in their state governments. To many degrees, of course, but people as a whole are more interested in national politics.

I'm also guessing the Federalists' case would have been much stronger today, as we have a pretty strong nationwide communications system.

Exactly! We're not living on farms and sh*t with the pony express anymore!


and that is relevant how? we still should be involved in our local govts. removing the electorate would further damage the govt that the constitution sets up.

QUOTE (Lord Madhammer @ Aug 1 2008, 02:38 PM) *
QUOTE (Nomolos @ Aug 1 2008, 04:36 PM) *
wow, I don't know what to say to that. you really don't care about your state govt? they have so much more to do with your life than apparently you realize. but anyway. its not indirect if you vote on your reps, that's a direct vote. its not any more direct if you vote for a president. he's still got to live up to what he says. and since the reps are the lawmakers that's where our voice needs to be heard.

I just know the relative place of state government. Of course I care about the roads and schools and stuff. But the national issues are the ones that are really important to me. It doesn't do me any good to have a voice in my state government if my president is acting like a fargwit in front of the entire world.

it could matter a great deal. in your state you could directly affect the things that are close to you about in a much more real way than bashing the pres. online.

*edit- btw you just proved my point. by taking your voice in the stae govt you affect who votes for the president.
Hobbes-timus Prime
QUOTE (Lord Madhammer @ Aug 1 2008, 01:38 PM) *
I just know the relative place of state government. Of course I care about the roads and schools and stuff. But the national issues are the ones that are really important to me. It doesn't do me any good to have a voice in my state government if my president is acting like a fargwit in front of the entire world.

agree.gif

Welcome to a Global Economy with cell phones and internet and nuclear missiles and stuffs. The framers of the constitutions got it right in determining what a man's basic liberties should be, but the manner in which they designed those rights to be delivered is just a tad out of date.
DarkNarcoleptic
I'm not saying that my state (and more importantly, local) government systems aren't important to me. It's just that your average citizen doesn't treat them as important as national issues. I understand how the chain of government breaks down from the federal level to the citizen; I'm just not sure how our presidental voting system really contributes to it.
Nomolos
QUOTE (( . Y . ) @ Aug 1 2008, 02:46 PM) *
I'm not saying that my state (and more importantly, local) government systems aren't important to me. It's just that your average citizen doesn't treat them as important as national issues. I understand how the chain of government breaks down from the federal level to the citizen; I'm just not sure how our presidental voting system really contributes to it.


if the avg citizen understood how its set up, they might care more. but thanks to our wonderful govt schools most folks don't know.
Lord Madhammer
QUOTE (Nomolos @ Aug 1 2008, 04:42 PM) *
*edit- btw you just proved my point. by taking your voice in the stae govt you affect who votes for the president.

I want ME to vote for the president.
Nomolos
QUOTE (Lord Madhammer @ Aug 1 2008, 02:50 PM) *
QUOTE (Nomolos @ Aug 1 2008, 04:42 PM) *
*edit- btw you just proved my point. by taking your voice in the stae govt you affect who votes for the president.

I want ME to vote for the president.

sorry, we live in a republic. Shrug.gif
as long as the constitution is the law of the land the best you can do is vote for the state reps you want and get the electorates to align with your values.
Lord Madhammer
QUOTE (Nomolos @ Aug 1 2008, 04:53 PM) *
QUOTE (Lord Madhammer @ Aug 1 2008, 02:50 PM) *
QUOTE (Nomolos @ Aug 1 2008, 04:42 PM) *
*edit- btw you just proved my point. by taking your voice in the stae govt you affect who votes for the president.

I want ME to vote for the president.

sorry, we live in a republic. Shrug.gif
as long as the constitution is the law of the land the best you can do is vote for the state reps you want and get the electorates to align with your values.

OMFG NO SHIT SHERLOCK THAT'S WHY I DON'T LIKE THE SYSTEM

*calms down, adjusts tie*


actually I'm not wearing a tie
DarkNarcoleptic
That's the thing- I don't want to do away with complete republic-ness, but there are just some aspects of it that are unneeded because we have cell phones and fax lines and internet tubes and stuff, things that the founders of our country did not foresee. Communicatively speaking, America is a much smaller nation that it was at its inception. There is more room for direct representation.
Nomolos
QUOTE (Lord Madhammer @ Aug 1 2008, 02:55 PM) *
QUOTE (Nomolos @ Aug 1 2008, 04:53 PM) *
QUOTE (Lord Madhammer @ Aug 1 2008, 02:50 PM) *
QUOTE (Nomolos @ Aug 1 2008, 04:42 PM) *
*edit- btw you just proved my point. by taking your voice in the stae govt you affect who votes for the president.

I want ME to vote for the president.

sorry, we live in a republic. Shrug.gif
as long as the constitution is the law of the land the best you can do is vote for the state reps you want and get the electorates to align with your values.

OMFG NO shot SHERLOCK THAT'S WHY I DON'T LIKE THE SYSTEM

*calms down, adjusts tie*


actually I'm not wearing a tie


so...what did you adjust?

*snaps pic*

I wasn't trying to be a jackass.



well maybe a little but, I prefer a republic. of course we already knew that we disagree on most political subjects.
DarkNarcoleptic
I would prefer a feudal system where mayors own all the local land that they then lend out to nobles for in return for protection. It would work well in the South, we have lots of guns and have already seceded once.
Lord Madhammer
QUOTE (( . Y . ) @ Aug 1 2008, 05:01 PM) *
That's the thing- I don't want to do away with complete republic-ness, but there are just some aspects of it that are unneeded because we have cell phones and fax lines and internet tubes and stuff, things that the founders of our country did not foresee. Communicatively speaking, America is a much smaller nation that it was at its inception. There is more room for direct representation.

This is what I am saying.
Glue
QUOTE (Lord Madhammer @ Aug 1 2008, 01:55 PM) *
OMFG NO shot SHERLOCK THAT'S WHY I DON'T LIKE THE SYSTEM

That's how Cobra Commander got started! palpatine.png
Nomolos
QUOTE (( . Y . ) @ Aug 1 2008, 03:21 PM) *
I would prefer a feudal system where mayors own all the local land that they then lend out to nobles for in return for protection. It would work well in the South, we have lots of guns and have already seceded once.



alright that's it, I'm voting for Boobies.
Lord Madhammer
QUOTE (Nomolos @ Aug 1 2008, 08:02 PM) *
alright that's it, I'm voting for Boobies.

You can vote for them?

*registers*
DarkNarcoleptic
VOTE FOR BOOBIES

A TIT IN EVERY MOUTH BY 2010
Nomolos
beats the hell out of Obamaniac and McWalkingcain.
Lord Madhammer
I'm cool because I supported Obama before he became Jesus.
Stormtrooper53
QUOTE (Lord Madhammer @ Aug 4 2008, 10:46 AM) *
I'm cool because I supported Obama before he became Jesus.

Nomolos
QUOTE (Lord Madhammer @ Aug 4 2008, 08:46 AM) *
I'm cool because I supported Obama before he became Jesus.


"al light will shine down, you'll have an epiphany, you will realize 'i have to vote for Barack'...people of the world this is our moment...this is the moment when the waters begin to recede and the earth begins to heal" -so sayeth the sheperd
*paraphrased of course for the quote nazi's*
too bad I don't believe in a messiah. Shrug.gif or an anti-messiah or al-gore. I know he didn't invent the innernetz, cuz Pete did.



ROSEDOGGYDOG
QUOTE (Nomolos @ Aug 4 2008, 12:01 PM) *
QUOTE (Lord Madhammer @ Aug 4 2008, 08:46 AM) *
I'm cool because I supported Obama before he became Jesus.


"al light will shine down, you'll have an epiphany, you will realize 'i have to vote for Barack'...people of the world this is our moment...this is the moment when the waters begin to recede and the earth begins to heal" -so sayeth the sheperd
*paraphrased of course for the quote nazi's*
too bad I don't believe in a messiah. Shrug.gif or an anti-messiah or al-gore. I know he didn't invent the innernetz, cuz Pete did.


Haggisjin
ROSEDOGGYDOG
rofl.gif that was too much rofl.gif
DarkNarcoleptic
laughlol.gif 1000 points
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.