Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Under pressure from EMI, RIAA could disappear
TFormers Community > General News & Discussions > General
Mom
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080...-disappear.html

QUOTE
Is the RIAA as we know it about to disappear? As rumors continue to swirl that EMI will pull its funding from music trade groups like the RIAA and IFPI, an IFPI spokesman tells Ars that the group is in the middle of a major internal review of its operations.

Related StoriesReport: EMI looking to slash funding for RIAA, IFPI
Former AllOfMP3 boss found "not guilty" in Russian court
That review will include a look at the "structure and operation of the organisation and its relationship with the national groups, with a view to finding greater efficiencies and cutting costs," we're told. That leaves open the possibility that the review could lead to a merger of the IFPI and RIAA, which is the largest (and most expensive) of the "national groups." If that happens, the "RIAA" might disappear even as its work continues.

The comments from the IFPI fit with a new story in Variety which claims that EMI will pull funding from the trade groups by March 31 unless major changes are made. Consolidating the two groups appears to be one of the options on the table.


Losing one of its four pillars would come as a huge blow to both the IFPI and the RIAA, and the review now in progress is an attempt to retool the trade groups' missions to better serve the record labels that fund most of their operations.


End Money to IFPI? Major label music has had a hard time of it the last few years; even as the labels have moved plenty of music (due in large part to the growth of digital downloads), more lucrative CD sales have plummeted. The IFPI admits that its internal review is prompted in large part "by falling industry revenues resulting from the decline in global music sales."

While EMI's threat to pull its funding might seem like a cost-cutting measure, Variety's source claims that isn't the case at all. Rather, "Functions and structure need to make sense to all major labels. Right now, funding them doesn't make sense."

EMI has been unhappy with the trade groups' work for some time. Back in November, we noted that EMI was considering a major cut to its funding of industry trade groups. EMI, the smallest of the four major labels, was recently purchased by a private equity fund that is looking to reinvigorate the label and cut expenses.

EMI was the first of the majors to drop DRM at iTunes and Amazon, moves that have made its digital music a more attractive option. But if EMI can force a restructuring of the IFPI and RIAA, the impact could be just as significant for the industry.


Gotta thank Drippy at some other unnamed board for the link.
FREEFALLL666
QUOTE (Hellscream333 @ Jan 15 2008, 05:19 PM) *
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080...-disappear.html

QUOTE
Is the RIAA as we know it about to disappear? As rumors continue to swirl that EMI will pull its funding from music trade groups like the RIAA and IFPI, an IFPI spokesman tells Ars that the group is in the middle of a major internal review of its operations.

Related StoriesReport: EMI looking to slash funding for RIAA, IFPI
Former AllOfMP3 boss found "not guilty" in Russian court
That review will include a look at the "structure and operation of the organisation and its relationship with the national groups, with a view to finding greater efficiencies and cutting costs," we're told. That leaves open the possibility that the review could lead to a merger of the IFPI and RIAA, which is the largest (and most expensive) of the "national groups." If that happens, the "RIAA" might disappear even as its work continues.

The comments from the IFPI fit with a new story in Variety which claims that EMI will pull funding from the trade groups by March 31 unless major changes are made. Consolidating the two groups appears to be one of the options on the table.


Losing one of its four pillars would come as a huge blow to both the IFPI and the RIAA, and the review now in progress is an attempt to retool the trade groups' missions to better serve the record labels that fund most of their operations.


End Money to IFPI? Major label music has had a hard time of it the last few years; even as the labels have moved plenty of music (due in large part to the growth of digital downloads), more lucrative CD sales have plummeted. The IFPI admits that its internal review is prompted in large part "by falling industry revenues resulting from the decline in global music sales."

While EMI's threat to pull its funding might seem like a cost-cutting measure, Variety's source claims that isn't the case at all. Rather, "Functions and structure need to make sense to all major labels. Right now, funding them doesn't make sense."

EMI has been unhappy with the trade groups' work for some time. Back in November, we noted that EMI was considering a major cut to its funding of industry trade groups. EMI, the smallest of the four major labels, was recently purchased by a private equity fund that is looking to reinvigorate the label and cut expenses.

EMI was the first of the majors to drop DRM at iTunes and Amazon, moves that have made its digital music a more attractive option. But if EMI can force a restructuring of the IFPI and RIAA, the impact could be just as significant for the industry.


Gotta thank Drippy at some other unnamed board for the link.
0Guess if he was bannorized from that board his e-mail would contain a picture of the cop from Transformers holding that cup saying NO DRIPPY DRIPPY bumblebeetounge.gif
Mom
^sure

http://www.ifpi.org/

If this falls through what do you think the implications are going to be and how do you think they will handle business from here on out? There's never been much in the news of the IFPI which makes me wonder if they'll continue the current on the route the RIAA is on or whether they'll act a bit more civil.
FREEFALLL666
Newer organisations when given power tend to be more strict.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.