QUOTE (Hellscream333 @ Nov 25 2007, 08:58 PM)

POST PREWARNING: I'm not flaming or being a dick. I just can't help but be sarcastic. Please take it with a grain of salt and

. It's my feeble attempt at injecting fun and interest not flame and trolling.
QUOTE (splendic @ Nov 25 2007, 12:11 PM)

QUOTE (Hellscream333 @ Nov 25 2007, 10:11 AM)

I think it's all relative to the constant reimagining that TF goes through. But given that, I think it's also strange that TF fans constantly Starscream about that. I mean, you know the reimagining is coming every year. It also boggles my mind when people say Hasbro doesn't do anything for the fans. In the past 5-6 years they've done plenty between reissues, Alts, MP's, Titaniums, Classics and all of the G1 homages they throw into any given line. We're only 13% of thier market and they treat us like gold with all of these specialty/collector oriented lines they give us not to mention things they do at the cons; appearences, specialty molds and exclusives. We're spoiled and the people who Starscream really don't have a leg to stand on. But I also think there's the same percentage of bitchy fans in any given fandom it's just that you see them raise their ugly heads in TF so much more because of the afformentioned constant reimaginings.
Are you kidding me? Treat the collectors like gold?
The collectors have the most reason to Starscream because the company is marketing products toward them, the most discerning crowd, and then half-assing it...
Alternators...
- Dead End was obviously Sunstreaker, and was randomly changed to a Con he barely resembles
- Swindle is made out of what was supposed to be Trailbreaker
- Overdrive becomes what was supposed to be Windcharger, then the other S2000 mold uses the actual windcharger head, but instead becomes a new character, Decepticharge (wtf?)
- Battle Ravage... do I need to explain how retarded this one is?
- Sideswipe mold was originally intended for Tracks
- Alt Optimus, possibly the most important release, has arguably the most laughable mold
Exclusives...
- Almost always underproduced, overpriced, and hard to find, Alt Hotrod, Nemi Prime, the list goes on...
MPs - Most are fragile, almost all have had QC issues, crazy expensive
Reissues - obvioulsy weren't produced in small runs, and yet still were 2-4 times the price of current TF toys of the same size.
The reality is, that there are plenty of things to Starscream about when it comes to TFs. They have the same people working on the main toylines working on the collectors lines most of the time, and those are markets that need to be treated entirely differently.
-And we got our poor little Sunstreaker after all didn't we...
-You guys can say that about Swindle up and down but I'm sorry, Swindle was never a Jeep and it's just a repaint. We got hound and he rocks!
-Who the hell is Overdrive and when did we ever get one in
Alternators? His name IS Windcharger...Even says it on the box
http://cyberstore.decepticon-matrix.com/al...dchargermib.jpg Binaltech is not the same as Alternators.
- The other S200 (Decepticharge) most certainly does not use windchargers head.
Decepticharge -
http://seibertron.com/images/toys/files/29...ticharge079.jpgG1 Windcharger and his scary box/bucket helmut -
http://www.superkahramanlar.com/transforme...ger2%5B1%5D.gifThese two look nothing alike IMO. And I'm sorry but I'd rather have the head they gave windcharger on the alt than have the face-in-a-box G1 gave us. God forgive Has/tak for trying to improve on an old crappy idea.
And I think it's funny that you're carrying on about getting ONE brand new character in a line of old favorites and the usual repaints. Some say he should have been Dragstrip but in the end....it's just a name. I call him Megatron....
Battle Ravage: I think you're forgetting that these were never even intended for the US market. To answer this I will refer you to the Binaltech story and just simply say......Battle Ravage is a repaint. Dude, this mold was put out three times in the US and when G1 homaging fans reared their ugly head because {OH NOESSS} Tracks wasn't blue Hasbro bent over backwards to change his color and appease these nonsensical complaints. (And personally I'm still fairly sore about that as Tracks looked better in yellow and so does the C6 Corvette) And finally.......we got our Ravage too didn't we. Yup, four legs and all.
Sideswipe: So what? I'm sorry but the Vette we got for tracks works and fits him way better and the same can be said for the Viper/Sideswipe. this is seriously nitpicking.
Prime: Why would this be the most important? Nearly everyone up until his release wasn't even expecting a Prime and considered 20th Op to be the leader of this line. And this is your personal opinion clashing with mine because I happen to like the mold. He's highly posable, updates the look of the G1 character and is a faithful recreation to the Dodge Pickup that he is. Remind me why we even needed a Prime for this line?
QUOTE
Exclusives...
- Almost always underproduced, overpriced, and hard to find, Alt Hotrod, Nemi Prime, the list goes on...
Well....yeah! That's kind of the idea. Limited runs = highly collectable figure. Everyone wants at least one toy in their collection they can hold as a prize over others. Nearly every one you named could've been gotten either online, at a convention or both. If you weren't on at the right time or didn't go to the Con that's your fault not Hasbros.
MP's: most are fragile? Most would require more than one and so far there have only been two released in the US; Prime and Starscream. Prime is by no means fragile. That thing is the tank of toys. Starscream could be considered fragile but seriously think about this: the more moving parts you put into something, the more complicated you make something the more room there is for error. And I will also say this: I have this mold (MPSS) three times and I wouldn't call him fragile. I'd call him easy to break if you don't follow the instructions. And regarding the QC issue: every toy line on the planet suffers from QC. Mistakes happen. If the toy is broke--return/exchange it. The toy gets returned to Hasbro and destroyed while you either get a new toy or your money back. And for the record: out of over 700 transformers toy purchases I have had ONE QC issue. That's a pretty good track record in my book and also inculdes two Mp primes and the three afformentioned seekers all of which are played with regularly.
QUOTE
Reissues - obvioulsy weren't produced in small runs, and yet still were 2-4 times the price of current TF toys of the same size.
And you're blaming Hasbro for this? The reissues were sold exclusively at TRU and in case you haven't noticed TRU has a mad crazy markup on damn near anything and everything that is exclusive to their store and in some cases their markup makes no sense at all. I will reference DVD anniversary Prime at a TRU retail of 90$. Standard retail and any other store..........was at least 20$ cheaper. You want to blame someone blame TRU for this. They did the markup. Walmart, Target and all of the other normal chain stores weren't willing to carry these toys becasue they didn't think they could sell them. But again, Hasbro chose to appease the fans and reissued them as well as finding and striking a deal with a retailer to get them out on the market.
QUOTE
The reality is, that there are plenty of things to Starscream about when it comes to TFs. They have the same people working on the main toylines working on the collectors lines most of the time, and those are markets that need to be treated entirely differently.
Sure, if you like to be nitpicky as all get out. Hasbro doesn't need to service us. Hasbro is a company and the only thing that really matters to any company is the bottom line and whether that's black or red. But they choose to take the extra step where nearly no other company does and go the extra mile for the 13% adult collector share of their market. Pennies in the bucket to them but they work to make us happy.
You can't treat the two markets differently. For them to set aside an entire development team just for 13% of their market makes no sense at all. The reason they have one team doing all things is because they're trying to market and make toys for kids first and collectors second. Alts, Titaniums....these lines died because kids took no interest in them. If I'm loosing money on a piece of stock you can be sure I'm going to dump it. You can also bet that in the same situation I'm going to take care of the stocks that are earning me money first. In order for Hasbro to keep the fans happy and keep the bottom line black they have to strive to achieve and market what they make to whom it's intended for.....Children.......welcome Classics and Classics 2.0/Universe2.0. A compromise of both worlds intended to sell to children and appease the adult collector.
I'm going to preface this by saying that of all the issues I brought up, I don't personally care about them all that much, and excessive Starscreaming, especially about the mainline toys intended for 5 year olds, annoys the Blot out of me too, however to claim that Hasbro hasn't made any mistakes worth mentioning in their collectors lines is ridiculous.
And before you claim that the Alt line was not intended for collectors, all you'd have to do is look at a couple of pictures to recognize that the entire line was an homage to G1. Not just in name alone like some mainline homages, but in complete design, coloring, headscuplts, etc... These TFs were inteneded to be recognized by and appeal to adults, while being accessible to kids. But it's accessibility to children does not in any way give reason to randomly abandon many of the homage/collectible aspects of the line.
So to actually respond....
1st off, :rolleyes
If you don't want to come off like a dick, then don't respond like one...
Most of the info I'm going to cite comes from here, and was discussed and generally agreed upon, ad nauseum, on most of the TF message boards...
http://web.archive.org/web/20051231133407/...ch_english.htmland here...
http://tfu.info Read up on these, because you've been misinformed.
1. Alt Sunstreaker was indeed released...after between one and two years of fan Starscreaming. Good job, vocal fans.
2. Swindle was never a jeep?
What's this then...?

It's been shown over and again that the Alt Swindle Head was meant to be Trailbreaker, but became a Con instead because the line was lacking Cons to date. Your choosing to ignore that doesn't make it less true. Read the Binalternators page or do a search here if you truly are unable to see the correlations on the headsculpt designs.
3. Say hi to Overdrive...
http://tfu.info/1985/Autobot/Overdrive/overdrive.htmLook familiar? It's the toy that Alt "Windcharger" was based on.
4. Decpeticharge didn't have Windcharger's originally inteneded head?
http://web.archive.org/web/20051125042907/...er_english.htmlAs shown in the Transformers Binaltech and Collection Complete Guide, the Decepticharge headsculpt was originally intended to be on the Alt Grimlock body, but lost the second mold to Alt Wheeljack. His consolation prize was becoming a Con with a different body.
Now I noticed you keep claiming that the Binaltechs and Alternators are not one and the same...
...But they were designed between Hasbro and Takara, and obviously the toy lines designing, naming, and releases closely intertwined, whether or not you choose to recognize it. True one was exclusive to the US and one to Japan, but the designs all came from the same place.
5. Sorry to confuse you with the "Battle Ravage" nomenclature. the identical and nearly identically named US figure was Ravage, and was, as most fans decided...stupid as hell. A bad repaint indeed, copying a mold that was later used again on another WTF?!?!-inducing homage.
6. MP's being fragile. Hmm...I'm glad yours have been fine.
However, there have been plenty of reported issues of the various MP Prime molds losing there legs and not being able to reattach them. I've seen it happen first hand 3 times, on display pieces (i.e., not played with.)
Plenty of people have also reported hinge stress and breaking with the MP SS... and it's only been out 3 weeks!
With pricey collectibles (call them toys all you want, but we all know who these are for) these issues are worth complaining about.
7. You're right about the exclusives. I should have thought that one out an extra second. I guess my frustration over not being able to afford them/find them got the better of me...

8. Reissues, I find it hard to believe that TRU marked up the toys 300%-500% in comparison to TF toys of the same size. Is it possible, yes, but I would guess that it was a combination of a TRU markup and Hasbro thinking it could get away with charging ridiculous prices becuase they were trying to sell to an age group that supposedly has "disposable income."
9. You're absolutely right about Hasbro not
needing to service the collector. As a matter of fact, before the new movie came out, I don't think they had any idea how strong the adult draw to the franchise still is.
But although they don't
need to service the collector, they try anyway. And some of those tries have been abysmal. And the entire Alt line ending as a WTF for most people is just one simple proof, and the Titaniums line being mostly floppy, poorly painted toys is another...
If they
are going to keep
trying to service us, they should allow third party collectible companies make licensed products, the same way they do with the minibusts and statues. That way, the guys who got hired to design and make toys for 5 year olds, won't also being making the collectibles for adults.
It's a simple win-win solution.
And again you're correct when you say that all Hasbro is concerned with is the bottom line. Which begs the question... if they're making collector-centric toys, must it not be serving their profits?
Where you argue that Alts and Titaniums died for lack of kids buying, I'd come right back and say that if they kept the quality of those lines up to the standards of the people they were
really making those lines for, they'd still be around.
The markets MUST be kept separate to truly stay succesful on both fronts, ala Star Wars...
You give Hasbro a pardon, and I say they've made mistakes worth discussing.