Bizzmoff
Jul 10 2007, 04:48 PM
I have seen the film in a regular theater and am going to see it Friday afternoon on a digital projector. Has anybody seen both and noticed a difference?
One thing that I didn't like was how detailed the shots of the movie look on the INTERNET and how fuzzy and blurry they looked on the screen. Was that the effect of the old fashioned screen of was my brain just running slow?
Skoponok's Skopions
Jul 10 2007, 04:55 PM
QUOTE (Bizzmoff @ Jul 10 2007, 05:48 PM)

I have seen the film in a regular theater and am going to see it Friday afternoon on a digital projector. Has anybody seen both and noticed a difference?
One thing that I didn't like was how detailed the shots of the movie look on the INTERNET and how fuzzy and blurry they looked on the screen. Was that the effect of the old fashioned screen of was my brain just running slow?
must be your brain, I've seen many movies on the big screen and did not see any problems
Buddykiller
Jul 10 2007, 05:38 PM
same here, no problems at all from a projecter. quite possibly out of focus on your screening?
Ol' Timer
Jul 10 2007, 06:40 PM
I saw the movie twice, both times in the same theater and it was digital. I do know that a few of the scenes did look fuzzy but I'm not sure if that was part of the filming or not.
Bizzmoff
Jul 10 2007, 06:41 PM
Perhaps I need a monocle
JustLOKIPLVY
Jul 10 2007, 07:41 PM
QUOTE (RIBFIR Her Pleasure @ Jul 10 2007, 08:40 PM)

I saw the movie twice, both times in the same theater and it was digital. I do know that a few of the scenes did look fuzzy but I'm not sure if that was part of the filming or not.
Dude that is one hell of a spoiler.
Film. I think it looks better & captures something digital can't in some movies.
JMO.
Goktimus Prime
Jul 10 2007, 07:49 PM
Mine was so clear I could see John Turturro's arm hair... oh wait... ;p
DarkNarcoleptic
Jul 10 2007, 07:59 PM
Yeah...mine was DLP, and it was crystal. I saw it later on a smaller screen and it was not so great.
(Still awesome, of course)
PlumperHumper
Jul 10 2007, 08:10 PM
QUOTE (DarkNarcoleptic @ Jul 10 2007, 08:59 PM)

Yeah...mine was DLP, and it was crystal. I saw it later on a smaller screen and it was not so great.
(Still awesome, of course)
Yup - agrees.
Hot Rod
Jul 11 2007, 04:13 AM
I've only seen it on DLP so I don't know, but it was crystal clear on the digital.
Agent TMan
Jul 11 2007, 05:44 AM
QUOTE (DeceptiBot SandLoki @ Jul 11 2007, 12:41 AM)

QUOTE (RIBFIR Her Pleasure @ Jul 10 2007, 08:40 PM)

I saw the movie twice, both times in the same theater and it was digital. I do know that a few of the scenes did look fuzzy but I'm not sure if that was part of the filming or not.
Dude that is one hell of a spoiler.
That's what I was gonna post.
Minus the Rofl though
siburke939
Jul 11 2007, 05:56 AM
QUOTE (Bizzmoff @ Jul 11 2007, 04:41 AM)

Perhaps I need a monocle

bwbm
Jul 11 2007, 09:17 AM
I've watched movies in digital and then regular film and digital obviously has better quality retention. Film just wears out quickly.
So the choice is yours, really.
I've also seen it in DLP and MY GOD it was amazing. Sharp, clear, super sweet.
Lord Madhammer
Jul 11 2007, 09:20 AM
Michael Bay loves his telephoto zoom shots. So that's part of what you're seeing.
But I saw the movie in DLP and Regular and honestly I don't think one is inherently superior to the other. DLP is crisper, film is warmer. But that's not a revelation.
Lebbie Skywalker
Jul 11 2007, 10:58 AM
I can never tell much difference between digital and non

I bothered to see sw: episode 3 in a digital theater and tried really hard to see a difference, but ultimately i am terrible at that kind of thing
Lord Madhammer
Jul 11 2007, 11:55 AM
well, Episode 3 was shot with digital cameras...
Bizzmoff
Jul 12 2007, 02:20 PM
I just got back from seeing it on a DLP and it was much better. I highly recommend choosing the digital projector if you have a choice. The Malco here had two DLP Transformers and one regular.
Excelsior Prime
Jul 13 2007, 05:00 PM
I saw TF the first time on film, the second time on digital.
Digital seemed much cripser, clearer, and alive somehow.
I definitely noticed a difference.
Also, the theater with the digital projection isn't all that clean or nice looking, but their sound system was amazing and really immersed me in the film.
Ex
Bizzmoff
Jul 13 2007, 07:59 PM
^ I agree about the sound as well. It was outstanding the second time... and it wasn't just because the "house" was bigger.
The sound on film will degrade after each showing and will never sound as pure as the digital track.
Buddykiller
Jul 14 2007, 10:48 PM
so uh, how can you tell the difference between a film theater and one with dlp?
DarkNarcoleptic
Jul 15 2007, 12:56 AM
QUOTE (Bizzmoff @ Jul 13 2007, 11:59 PM)

^ I agree about the sound as well. It was outstanding the second time... and it wasn't just because the "house" was bigger.
The sound on film will degrade after each showing and will never sound as pure as the digital track.
Unless I'm missing something, film can't record sound...
QUOTE (Buddykiller @ Jul 15 2007, 02:48 AM)

so uh, how can you tell the difference between a film theater and one with dlp?
a) Most theaters will have it say, in parenthesis-
Transformers 8:00 (DLP)b) If you see many typical cigarette burns and squiggles, it's film.
Buddykiller
Jul 15 2007, 02:03 AM
gotcha
i saw it in good ol' analog film then. thanks to Powerglideing fight club i always see the cigarette burns
i was able to catch it on the 4th so i didn't notice any degradation of the film and/or sound
Bizzmoff
Jul 15 2007, 07:52 PM
QUOTE (DarkNarcoleptic @ Jul 15 2007, 04:56 AM)

QUOTE (Bizzmoff @ Jul 13 2007, 11:59 PM)

^ I agree about the sound as well. It was outstanding the second time... and it wasn't just because the "house" was bigger.
The sound on film will degrade after each showing and will never sound as pure as the digital track.
Unless I'm missing something, film can't record sound...
The sound track is on the side of the film... not where the image is.
http://entertainment.howstuffworks.com/movie-sound4.htm
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.