http://community.livejournal.com/scans_dai...485.html#cutid1
If that link doesn't work, I'm willing to mirror the images.
And, please, can anyone tell me that this is a joke, a hoax? For the love of all that is holy, no biblical being should ever carry pouches like that!
Full Version: Liefeld takes on....the Bible!?!?
That's great
so goliath was a robot..... huh. i learned something today.
Samurai Moses rocks!
He's got a tiger stripe belt-tie!
oh....
My...
GOD!
only thing worse would be dialog by Scott Lobdell......
Someone sink this ship before it sails...
My...
GOD!
only thing worse would be dialog by Scott Lobdell......
Someone sink this ship before it sails...
if it's a liefield project, we'll probably get 2 issues the first year and excuses for delays after that 
I'm so buying those.
QUOTE (Hot Rod @ Feb 26 2007, 01:08 PM) 
I'm so buying those.
They'd make great illustrations for the Extreme Teen Bible.
I know its been said before - but OMFG Leifeild only knows how to draw like ONE human form!!!!! crap all mighty - why does he continue to get work?!?!
Also what good is parting the red Sea if the Pharoh has FLYING chariots??
Also what good is parting the red Sea if the Pharoh has FLYING chariots??
QUOTE (HunterRose @ Feb 26 2007, 09:00 PM)
I know its been said before - but OMFG Leifeild only knows how to draw like ONE human form!!!!! crap all mighty - why does he continue to get work?!?!
Also what good is parting the red Sea if the Pharoh has FLYING chariots??
Also what good is parting the red Sea if the Pharoh has FLYING chariots??
...you calling that form human?
And you're expecting logic from the guy who's epynomous with the Nineties?
QUOTE (Cuban Pete @ Feb 26 2007, 12:12 PM)
QUOTE (Hot Rod @ Feb 26 2007, 01:08 PM)
I'm so buying those.
They'd make great illustrations for the Extreme Teen Bible.
Because they're EXTREME?
QUOTE (HunterRose @ Feb 26 2007, 02:00 PM)
Also what good is parting the red Sea if the Pharoh has FLYING chariots??
shh
MCFLY YOU BOZO, HOVERBOARDS DON'T WORK ON WATER
although to be fair some of those poses are common enough in comics that they have to have been repeated at some point or another....
anyway Leifield is still a hack.
anyway Leifield is still a hack.
hmm, is that like, a ticket straight to hell for Liefeld?
QUOTE (HunterRose @ Feb 28 2007, 09:44 PM)
although to be fair some of those poses are common enough in comics that they have to have been repeated at some point or another....
No, you can tell that Liefeld is ripping them off directly because the only way he can draw humans with decent proportions is to trace over some one else's work.
QUOTE (Y2K Bug @ Mar 1 2007, 11:16 AM)
QUOTE (HunterRose @ Feb 28 2007, 09:44 PM)
although to be fair some of those poses are common enough in comics that they have to have been repeated at some point or another....
No, you can tell that Liefeld is ripping them off directly because the only way he can draw humans with decent proportions is to trace over some one else's work.
Yeah, but see, that's the thing, the pictures cited are pretty weird in the first place.
How will Jesus walk on water when his feet are going to be so pointy?
So, what publisher is taking this on again?
QUOTE (SharpTooth @ Mar 5 2007, 11:10 AM)
So, what publisher is taking this on again?
nobody yet. It's just sketches of an idea liefeld wants to do.
QUOTE
NRAMA: We’ll talk more about the business side of this new venture in a moment, but you say Hotsenpiller has a "distinct, perhaps controversial point of view”? Can you expound upon that in a little more detail?
RL: He has a strong, researched point-of-view on current events pertaining to End Times prophecy and has a timeline he has charted that identifies events as he believes they are addressed in scriptures. There are differing points of view on subjects such as World War 3 occurring prior to the biblical Rapture and the collapse of the United States and its removal from the world stage setting the way for a one world government. Sounds crazy and radical but it's compelling.
RL: He has a strong, researched point-of-view on current events pertaining to End Times prophecy and has a timeline he has charted that identifies events as he believes they are addressed in scriptures. There are differing points of view on subjects such as World War 3 occurring prior to the biblical Rapture and the collapse of the United States and its removal from the world stage setting the way for a one world government. Sounds crazy and radical but it's compelling.
...OK. So the writer of this story actually believes his own fabrications?
don't most preachers believe their own interpretation to be the TRUE RELIGION. this guy just happened to speak to acrowd containing liefield. who was of course easily brainwashed. especially with the idea of working again tied to it.
QUOTE (Father Time @ Apr 16 2008, 03:09 PM)
QUOTE
NRAMA: We’ll talk more about the business side of this new venture in a moment, but you say Hotsenpiller has a "distinct, perhaps controversial point of view”? Can you expound upon that in a little more detail?
RL: He has a strong, researched point-of-view on current events pertaining to End Times prophecy and has a timeline he has charted that identifies events as he believes they are addressed in scriptures. There are differing points of view on subjects such as World War 3 occurring prior to the biblical Rapture and the collapse of the United States and its removal from the world stage setting the way for a one world government. Sounds crazy and radical but it's compelling.
RL: He has a strong, researched point-of-view on current events pertaining to End Times prophecy and has a timeline he has charted that identifies events as he believes they are addressed in scriptures. There are differing points of view on subjects such as World War 3 occurring prior to the biblical Rapture and the collapse of the United States and its removal from the world stage setting the way for a one world government. Sounds crazy and radical but it's compelling.
...OK. So the writer of this story actually believes his own fabrications?
oh lord...
the Bible also says that nobody knows when it's all gonna happen, but I guess that never stopped anyone
P.S. Apocamon totally pwns this
QUOTE (Speedo ES @ Feb 26 2007, 10:27 AM)
if it's a liefield project, we'll probably get 2 issues the first year and excuses for delays after that 
This is still my opinion, over a year later.
I hadn't ever actually seen or hear Liefeld before. I knew he was an awful over-the-top artist, for which I really did not care. After this...I just can't take him seriously anymore. Ever. He's an idiot.
http://www.newsarama.com/nycomiccon2008/vi...robliefeld.html
http://www.newsarama.com/nycomiccon2008/vi...robliefeld.html
to the look on the face of the guy interviewing him... you wonder what he must be thinking
Indeed. The first time an interviewer is scared of his subject. I mean, bestiality?
I think Liefeld should do some EXTREEEM sit-ups...
QUOTE
when I was growing up, there were these, like, grindhouse christian movies
wat
QUOTE (I.S.T. @ Apr 25 2008, 11:33 AM)
QUOTE
when I was growing up, there were these, like, grindhouse christian movies
wat
Hey, the dude is from Anaheim. That's enough of an explanation as is.
".. to all the hardcore 'xtreme' fans who've supported me all these years. Cuz those guys? Without them, I'm nuthin'! I mean honestly, they have held my career up.."
I can't really describe why, but that statement is my favorite part.
I can't really describe why, but that statement is my favorite part.
Wasn't Liefield Pat Lee's mentor? (probably explains a lot - I hate both Liefield and Lee's art)
Forget his so-called theological research - he clearly hasn't even done historical research. I'm not religious at all, but I can tell you that fashion wise half the crap those guys are wearing are completely out of period. Textiles and fashion, like a lot of things, is based on technology (in fact, it was the textiles industry (primarily in Germany) that was the forerunner to modern-day R&D - something that saw an explosion (sic) in popularity after the advent of the atomic bomb)... some of those characters are wearing clothes based on textile and fashion technology that absolutely did not exist back then!
When I was a uni student I used to be a member of a medieval and renaissance recreation society and other people would nitpick the crap out of you if you had even a stitch method that was historically inaccurate. Our costumes had to be historically accurate down to the last thread.
And to be fair and inclusive, Liefield should now do comics based on other religious texts too. I would seriously love to see a comic book done on the Buddhist tale of Saiyuuki (Journey To The West) - which was the core inspiration for Dragon Ball.
Wasn't Liefield Pat Lee's mentor? (probably explains a lot - I hate both Liefield and Lee's art)
Forget his so-called theological research - he clearly hasn't even done historical research. I'm not religious at all, but I can tell you that fashion wise half the crap those guys are wearing are completely out of period. Textiles and fashion, like a lot of things, is based on technology (in fact, it was the textiles industry (primarily in Germany) that was the forerunner to modern-day R&D - something that saw an explosion (sic) in popularity after the advent of the atomic bomb)... some of those characters are wearing clothes based on textile and fashion technology that absolutely did not exist back then!
When I was a uni student I used to be a member of a medieval and renaissance recreation society and other people would nitpick the crap out of you if you had even a stitch method that was historically inaccurate. Our costumes had to be historically accurate down to the last thread.
And to be fair and inclusive, Liefield should now do comics based on other religious texts too. I would seriously love to see a comic book done on the Buddhist tale of Saiyuuki (Journey To The West) - which was the core inspiration for Dragon Ball.
Forget his so-called theological research - he clearly hasn't even done historical research. I'm not religious at all, but I can tell you that fashion wise half the crap those guys are wearing are completely out of period. Textiles and fashion, like a lot of things, is based on technology (in fact, it was the textiles industry (primarily in Germany) that was the forerunner to modern-day R&D - something that saw an explosion (sic) in popularity after the advent of the atomic bomb)... some of those characters are wearing clothes based on textile and fashion technology that absolutely did not exist back then!
When I was a uni student I used to be a member of a medieval and renaissance recreation society and other people would nitpick the crap out of you if you had even a stitch method that was historically inaccurate. Our costumes had to be historically accurate down to the last thread.
And to be fair and inclusive, Liefield should now do comics based on other religious texts too. I would seriously love to see a comic book done on the Buddhist tale of Saiyuuki (Journey To The West) - which was the core inspiration for Dragon Ball.
Wasn't Liefield Pat Lee's mentor? (probably explains a lot - I hate both Liefield and Lee's art)
Forget his so-called theological research - he clearly hasn't even done historical research. I'm not religious at all, but I can tell you that fashion wise half the crap those guys are wearing are completely out of period. Textiles and fashion, like a lot of things, is based on technology (in fact, it was the textiles industry (primarily in Germany) that was the forerunner to modern-day R&D - something that saw an explosion (sic) in popularity after the advent of the atomic bomb)... some of those characters are wearing clothes based on textile and fashion technology that absolutely did not exist back then!
When I was a uni student I used to be a member of a medieval and renaissance recreation society and other people would nitpick the crap out of you if you had even a stitch method that was historically inaccurate. Our costumes had to be historically accurate down to the last thread.
And to be fair and inclusive, Liefield should now do comics based on other religious texts too. I would seriously love to see a comic book done on the Buddhist tale of Saiyuuki (Journey To The West) - which was the core inspiration for Dragon Ball.
QUOTE (Goktimus Prime @ Apr 27 2008, 05:27 AM)
Wasn't Liefield Pat Lee's mentor? (probably explains a lot - I hate both Liefield and Lee's art)
Forget his so-called theological research - he clearly hasn't even done historical research. I'm not religious at all, but I can tell you that fashion wise half the crap those guys are wearing are completely out of period. Textiles and fashion, like a lot of things, is based on technology (in fact, it was the textiles industry (primarily in Germany) that was the forerunner to modern-day R&D - something that saw an explosion (sic) in popularity after the advent of the atomic bomb)... some of those characters are wearing clothes based on textile and fashion technology that absolutely did not exist back then!
When I was a uni student I used to be a member of a medieval and renaissance recreation society and other people would nitpick the crap out of you if you had even a stitch method that was historically inaccurate. Our costumes had to be historically accurate down to the last thread.
And to be fair and inclusive, Liefield should now do comics based on other religious texts too. I would seriously love to see a comic book done on the Buddhist tale of Saiyuuki (Journey To The West) - which was the core inspiration for Dragon Ball.
Forget his so-called theological research - he clearly hasn't even done historical research. I'm not religious at all, but I can tell you that fashion wise half the crap those guys are wearing are completely out of period. Textiles and fashion, like a lot of things, is based on technology (in fact, it was the textiles industry (primarily in Germany) that was the forerunner to modern-day R&D - something that saw an explosion (sic) in popularity after the advent of the atomic bomb)... some of those characters are wearing clothes based on textile and fashion technology that absolutely did not exist back then!
When I was a uni student I used to be a member of a medieval and renaissance recreation society and other people would nitpick the crap out of you if you had even a stitch method that was historically inaccurate. Our costumes had to be historically accurate down to the last thread.
And to be fair and inclusive, Liefield should now do comics based on other religious texts too. I would seriously love to see a comic book done on the Buddhist tale of Saiyuuki (Journey To The West) - which was the core inspiration for Dragon Ball.
What the HELL are you talking about, man? His work isn't supposed to be historical accurate: Egypt has floating pyramids and flying chariots, the Ark is a spaceship, and Goliath is a monolithic robotic war machine! Historical accuracy is the least of your worries.
QUOTE (Father Time @ Apr 27 2008, 03:51 AM)
QUOTE (Goktimus Prime @ Apr 27 2008, 05:27 AM)
Forget his so-called theological research - he clearly hasn't even done historical research. I'm not religious at all, but I can tell you that fashion wise half the crap those guys are wearing are completely out of period.
What the HELL are you talking about, man? His work isn't supposed to be historical accurate: Egypt has floating pyramids and flying chariots, the Ark is a spaceship, and Goliath is a monolithic robotic war machine! Historical accuracy is the least of your worries.
Dude, I can tell you that Moses having had goggles is completely inaccurate -- wearable eye protection did not develop in the region until the 9th century! Liefeld clearly hasn't done his historical research!
QUOTE (Glue @ Apr 28 2008, 01:12 AM)
QUOTE (Father Time @ Apr 27 2008, 03:51 AM)
QUOTE (Goktimus Prime @ Apr 27 2008, 05:27 AM)
Forget his so-called theological research - he clearly hasn't even done historical research. I'm not religious at all, but I can tell you that fashion wise half the crap those guys are wearing are completely out of period.
What the HELL are you talking about, man? His work isn't supposed to be historical accurate: Egypt has floating pyramids and flying chariots, the Ark is a spaceship, and Goliath is a monolithic robotic war machine! Historical accuracy is the least of your worries.
Dude, I can tell you that Moses having had goggles is completely inaccurate -- wearable eye protection did not develop in the region until the 9th century! Liefeld clearly hasn't done his historical research!
Yeah, nevermind the rest, that's not important. Whatever was I thinking?
QUOTE (Goktimus Prime @ Apr 27 2008, 04:27 AM)
And to be fair and inclusive, Liefield should now do comics based on other religious texts too.
Why would he be fair and inclusive?
I don't see the point of that either. He's making a(VERYFUCKINGSHITTY) version of the religious text his religion follows. Why would he do a version for any other religion just to be fair?
BEING EQUAL OPPORTUNITY IS NOT EXTREEEEEEM
I for one can't wait to see Jesus kicking the sh!t out of a bunch of Roman Ninjas on rocketcycles. It's gonna RAWK!
*awaits the Four Snowboarders of the Apocalypse*
WAR, DEATH, CRUSH, & ZACK
This thread made my week!!! 
Who didn't read The Bible for all it's awesomely violent tales and parables of lust and bestiality?
I knew Liefeld was a piss-poor artist, but I never knew he was retarded to boot.
QUOTE (Lord Madhammer @ Apr 25 2008, 05:58 AM)
to the look on the face of the guy interviewing him... you wonder what he must be thinkingThat's exactly what I saw
QUOTE
This guy with flowing red hair, and swords, and he's killing aliens! And I was like "I love Killraven!" - And the name! Kill - Raven. It's a great name!
This explains a lot.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.