Revenge of the Fallen First Movie Offered on Branded USB Drives (View original topic)
MISP Steve
Posted 03 November 2009 - 08:20 AM
Liege Evilmus
Posted 03 November 2009 - 09:42 AM
Hell, my computer, cable box, Playstation, even my TV has a USB port.
I don't know much about computers and tech, but I do use flash drives. I also loose flash drives. So I wonder if they do attempt to make this a new practice in movies, can they get around that?
I look forward to seeing how this overall developes.
timothyVritchey
Posted 03 November 2009 - 10:24 AM
i wish rotf, like the dark knight, came with a digital copy of the movie.
i guess this is basically the same thing minus the dvd.
kow626
Posted 03 November 2009 - 10:43 AM
the original usb concept was to be able to reload the usb with new movie rentals, not sell usb outright with movies on them. i like the rental concept. i still got faith in it along with hi def streaming. they both just make the most sense these days, not redbox.
MikePrime
Posted 03 November 2009 - 10:46 AM
Liege Evilmus
Posted 03 November 2009 - 11:03 AM
Concerning the computer, I do stream more then I channel surf these days...
kow626
Posted 03 November 2009 - 11:04 AM
MikePrime, on 03 November 2009 - 01:46 PM, said:
i don't think you understand today's tech all that well from your comment. with hdmi, wireless, and media center capability, pc users can stream content from their computers to their tv. i have a regular hd monitor and a 67" 1080p tv hooked up via hdmi with vista media center. has a remote control and all the bells n whistles. a lot of, but not all, people don't sit at their computers to watch full length movies and such. that's just urban myth or ignorance. i'm not taking a shot at you or anything. just letting you know the type of tech that's available these days.
i'd much rather have the digital download in 1080p cuz my computer is powerful enough to handle it. the file size would be big but with hard drives selling for dirt cheap and having 2tb these days, storage wouldn't be an issue especially with a raid array. saves shelf space, it's cheaper, better for the environment, and you'd be getting the same quality. can't beat it. and it's not just me. there are many others who stream content to their tv's. so please dismiss the idea that people sit at their computers to watch movies and such. it's just not true.
MikePrime
Posted 03 November 2009 - 11:08 AM
kow626, on 03 November 2009 - 01:04 PM, said:
MikePrime, on 03 November 2009 - 01:46 PM, said:
i don't think you understand today's tech all that well from your comment. with hdmi, wireless, and media center capability, pc users can stream content from their computers to their tv. i have a regular hd monitor and a 67" 1080p tv hooked up via hdmi with vista media center. has a remote control and all the bells n whistles. a lot of, but not all, people don't sit at their computers to watch full length movies and such. that's just urban myth or ignorance. i'm not taking a shot at you or anything. just letting you know the type of tech that's available these days.
i'd much rather have the digital download in 1080p cuz my computer is powerful enough to handle it. the file size would be big but with hard drives selling for dirt cheap and having 2tb these days, storage wouldn't be an issue especially with a raid array. saves shelf space, it's cheaper, better for the environment, and you'd be getting the same quality. can't beat it. and it's not just me. there are many others who stream content to their tv's. so please dismiss the idea that people sit at their computers to watch movies and such. it's just not true.
I was really just talking about people who need a digital copy in addition to the DVD. Which is why I assume people would only be using on the computer or iPhone or something.
How is it better for the environment, though? Do a lot of people make the habit of throwing away their DVDs and DVD boxes? And if one doesn't keep the box, they can always put it with the recycling.
kow626
Posted 03 November 2009 - 11:21 AM
MikePrime, on 03 November 2009 - 02:08 PM, said:
kow626, on 03 November 2009 - 01:04 PM, said:
MikePrime, on 03 November 2009 - 01:46 PM, said:
i don't think you understand today's tech all that well from your comment. with hdmi, wireless, and media center capability, pc users can stream content from their computers to their tv. i have a regular hd monitor and a 67" 1080p tv hooked up via hdmi with vista media center. has a remote control and all the bells n whistles. a lot of, but not all, people don't sit at their computers to watch full length movies and such. that's just urban myth or ignorance. i'm not taking a shot at you or anything. just letting you know the type of tech that's available these days.
i'd much rather have the digital download in 1080p cuz my computer is powerful enough to handle it. the file size would be big but with hard drives selling for dirt cheap and having 2tb these days, storage wouldn't be an issue especially with a raid array. saves shelf space, it's cheaper, better for the environment, and you'd be getting the same quality. can't beat it. and it's not just me. there are many others who stream content to their tv's. so please dismiss the idea that people sit at their computers to watch movies and such. it's just not true.
I was really just talking about people who need a digital copy in addition to the DVD. Which is why I assume people would only be using on the computer or iPhone or something.
How is it better for the environment, though? Do a lot of people make the habit of throwing away their DVDs and DVD boxes? And if one doesn't keep the box, they can always put it with the recycling.
i agree with you on that one. if you're inclined to buy the dvd or bd, then what's the point of the digital copy bundled with it? physical media should stand on it's own and digital media should too. just make the option available is all we ask. people do upload files to their cell phone and watch media that way too. so that's yet another medium not being well served and profit not being made. all these concerns over file sharing and copyright is stifling innovation. it sucks.
let's say you've purchased a dvd and watched it. how many times are you really gonna watch that dvd? in time, it just takes up physical space. some people either back up the dvd and make a digital copy, resell the disc, give it away, or even toss it. not enough people recycle. i say the digital download is better for the environment cuz if the option was widely available, a lot of people would adopt it. that means manufacturers would use less paper, ink, plastic, human and natural resources to create and ship the physical media. that's how it's better for the environment. sure, some jobs might be lost but not anything significant. prices would fall as well which could increase spending so the economy doesn't lose with that business model.
Liege Evilmus
Posted 03 November 2009 - 11:42 AM
I still recycle every bit of metal and plastic refuse I have. These days though I bag it and put it in a nice tall can with attached lid so they don't know till they get to the dump.
Taaron
Posted 03 November 2009 - 12:20 PM
ETA: and man, Hasbro missed the ball on this one. They could made a Device Label Ravage remolded to look like Bayverse Ravage, and bundled the movie that way.
KFGatri
Posted 12 November 2009 - 09:06 AM
MikePrime, on 03 November 2009 - 02:46 PM, said:
It's perfect for watching a movie on a plane flight or train ride without having to carry a dedicated portable DVD player. I can watch a digital copy of a movie on my netbook, without the need for any additional storage media.
dcj91x
Posted 12 November 2009 - 10:40 AM
kow626, on 03 November 2009 - 01:21 PM, said:
MikePrime, on 03 November 2009 - 02:08 PM, said:
kow626, on 03 November 2009 - 01:04 PM, said:
MikePrime, on 03 November 2009 - 01:46 PM, said:
i don't think you understand today's tech all that well from your comment. with hdmi, wireless, and media center capability, pc users can stream content from their computers to their tv. i have a regular hd monitor and a 67" 1080p tv hooked up via hdmi with vista media center. has a remote control and all the bells n whistles. a lot of, but not all, people don't sit at their computers to watch full length movies and such. that's just urban myth or ignorance. i'm not taking a shot at you or anything. just letting you know the type of tech that's available these days.
i'd much rather have the digital download in 1080p cuz my computer is powerful enough to handle it. the file size would be big but with hard drives selling for dirt cheap and having 2tb these days, storage wouldn't be an issue especially with a raid array. saves shelf space, it's cheaper, better for the environment, and you'd be getting the same quality. can't beat it. and it's not just me. there are many others who stream content to their tv's. so please dismiss the idea that people sit at their computers to watch movies and such. it's just not true.
I was really just talking about people who need a digital copy in addition to the DVD. Which is why I assume people would only be using on the computer or iPhone or something.
How is it better for the environment, though? Do a lot of people make the habit of throwing away their DVDs and DVD boxes? And if one doesn't keep the box, they can always put it with the recycling.
i agree with you on that one. if you're inclined to buy the dvd or bd, then what's the point of the digital copy bundled with it? physical media should stand on it's own and digital media should too. just make the option available is all we ask. people do upload files to their cell phone and watch media that way too. so that's yet another medium not being well served and profit not being made. all these concerns over file sharing and copyright is stifling innovation. it sucks.
let's say you've purchased a dvd and watched it. how many times are you really gonna watch that dvd? in time, it just takes up physical space. some people either back up the dvd and make a digital copy, resell the disc, give it away, or even toss it. not enough people recycle. i say the digital download is better for the environment cuz if the option was widely available, a lot of people would adopt it. that means manufacturers would use less paper, ink, plastic, human and natural resources to create and ship the physical media. that's how it's better for the environment. sure, some jobs might be lost but not anything significant. prices would fall as well which could increase spending so the economy doesn't lose with that business model.
I am a firm believer in actually owning the DVD's you pay for and being able to watch them on any format of your choice. (not sharing them with others) My job has me traveling quite a bit as has many of my previous jobs. It is very nice to be able to take several of my movies with me to watch on one device instead of having several dvd's that might easily get lost. When I am at home the DVD is great to pop in and watch in all it's glory but when I am on a long plane ride or sitting at the doctors office it is even better to be able to pull out my eye phone, pop in my stereo bluetooth head set and past the 2 and a half hour wait watching a good movie instead of interacting with other people.
deceptikhan
Posted 15 November 2009 - 09:40 PM
kow626, on 03 November 2009 - 11:04 AM, said:
MikePrime, on 03 November 2009 - 01:46 PM, said:
i don't think you understand today's tech all that well from your comment. with hdmi, wireless, and media center capability, pc users can stream content from their computers to their tv. i have a regular hd monitor and a 67" 1080p tv hooked up via hdmi with vista media center. has a remote control and all the bells n whistles. a lot of, but not all, people don't sit at their computers to watch full length movies and such. that's just urban myth or ignorance. i'm not taking a shot at you or anything. just letting you know the type of tech that's available these days.
i'd much rather have the digital download in 1080p cuz my computer is powerful enough to handle it. the file size would be big but with hard drives selling for dirt cheap and having 2tb these days, storage wouldn't be an issue especially with a raid array. saves shelf space, it's cheaper, better for the environment, and you'd be getting the same quality. can't beat it. and it's not just me. there are many others who stream content to their tv's. so please dismiss the idea that people sit at their computers to watch movies and such. it's just not true.
This is a transformers site, not a super tech hacker site, so in order for (me & alot of others) to understand what you are sayin, why dont you explain what a 1080p IS, and streaming, and hdmi, media center capability, ect ect ect ect ect ect ect. Im just saying this cuz you come here "king of the world" and act like you know everything (which you may, idk but i guess maybe) and some of us cant keep up with tht. BUT can you keep up with us on knowledge of Transformers?
timothyVritchey
Posted 16 November 2009 - 03:48 AM
dcj91x, on 12 November 2009 - 10:40 AM, said:
who in the world interacts with people @ the doctors.. or a plane ride unless they* are an incredibly beautiful woman.
kow626
Posted 16 November 2009 - 06:07 AM
deceptikhan, on 16 November 2009 - 12:40 AM, said:
does the King Of the World really have to explain himself to his minions? lol. guy asked a question, i replied and gave an answer. this is the internet after all. plenty of dictionary sites out there, search engines, lots of services at yours and other people's disposal to learn what certain terms mean. that's what i do. knowledge is power! 1080p and hdmi...just type those exact words into almost any search engine and first up will probably be wikipedia. USE IT! and peep other sites too. the more you know, the further you'll go.
Powered by Invision Power Board (http://www.invisionboard.com)
© Invision Power Services (http://www.invisionpower.com)